- #Canon eos rebel t3i lenses drivers
- #Canon eos rebel t3i lenses upgrade
- #Canon eos rebel t3i lenses iso
I chose f/11 for those shots because it's a good aperture for marginally best sharpness and clarity on the 18-55 I have, based on testing of the lens I'd done previously.
#Canon eos rebel t3i lenses iso
Also, with the ISO capabilities on modern DSLRs, you can still shoot a lot faster and get away with it than I could on my old 20D at ISO 100 if that's what you want, though I was looking for the streaks of lights, so I would have used a longer shutter in any case, and DOF at those distances is not a factor - it's close to infinity. A lens with a wider range, a tripod and a shutter trigger are more important for that sort of work. Someone wrote to me a few years ago and said that the trees had now grown to the point of obscuring even that spot, so they didn't think the shot was even obtainable at all anymore, unless you get a permit to close down a lane and set up a lift platform to shoot it from.įor cityscapes and landscapes and subjects that aren't moving and subject that don't need a whole lot of creamy foreground or background via narrow DOF, you don't need a fast lens.
#Canon eos rebel t3i lenses drivers
I needed the versatility of the zoom to frame the composition, and the nifty fifty would not have allowed it, so it would have been the wrong choice.īy the way, I had to hike my gear up a hill from a parking lot maybe a quarter mile to a half mile away, with no sidewalk and no footpath, which became an almost suicidal adventure with the drivers on that road the way they were.
To my right and left, even just a few steps either way, and trees completely obscure the shot. On the other side of that, a mountain cliff face. 3 feet behind me was a busy road with crazy drivers. Bay Bridge was shot at 31mm, for example, and there was absolutely no other place to set up to get it than exactly in that spot. You'd do well to have one in your kit.īut I wouldn't have been able to use it on the shots above because I would have had to get further back to frame the composition, and there was no way to get further back from where I was. It's also got very nice corner to corner sharpness and clarity at all apertures. It does decent close-up portrait type stuff to give a nice out of focus background, for example, and if the landscape you've decided to shoot just happens to fit well as a composition at 50mm, it'd be a good lens for that as well. I have one myself and use it on occasion. The 50 1.8 is a good lens for some things, and not very expensive. It'll only cost you about $4200.00 or so.Īnd none of them would have worked or even helped at all for getting the shots I posted above, which were shot at about 5 seconds long each so that I could get the streaks of light that I chose for my compositions, so they didn't need a faster lens, and they wouldn't have worked at all for composition because they're not wide enough, since they were shot at 31mm and 22mm respectively. Want a 50mm that's "super fast"? Go for a 50mm f/1.0. The 1.4 is faster, and the 1.2 is faster still. 1.8 is faster than the 3.5 of the 18-55mm, but for a 50mm, I wouldn't say it's "super fast". Thank you very much and sorry for the long post!Ĭlick to expand.He means the lens. Or will I need a completely different lens after all? Now I have an additional question, I read that the Canon T3i has already a build-in image stabilizer, so will I really need an IS/VC in the lens aswel? or did I misunderstood something? I read long discussions about rather the Tamron VC or non-VC is better, and ended up with non-VC is better in terms of sharper but VC is better in terms of night photography and video. I came across the Tamron 17-50mm VC and non-VC, and also the Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 USM.
Since they are (especially the canon ones) are currently very pricey considering that I'm not a hardcore photographer, but I also don't want to get stuck with the kit lens, I need a "cheaper" f/2.8 lens for my purposes.
#Canon eos rebel t3i lenses upgrade
Now I also know that the kit lenses are usually not the most exciting ones and I need a budget friendly upgrade since I shoot as a amateur just for fun and myself.īut I do really like taking pictures at night of the city which sparkles in all their glory in all the city lights, so I did some research and understood that I will need a f/2.8 lens for good results. The first question which I already answered was if I should get a used Canon 40D or Canon T3i, I decided in favor of the T3i since I won't mind having a video option on certain times, which the 40D won't offer. I want to finally get a new camera and upgrade from my old (but still awesome because of the night vision) Sony DSC-F717 to a real DSLR.